![]() |
| Too many additives? |
While food scientists play a critical role in ensuring safety, shelf-life, and consistency, the difference between food designed by chefs and that created by food technologists is more than just semantics, it’s a matter of quality, nutrition, experience, and even trust.
Here’s why choosing food created by chefs and cooks is usually the better option:
1. Taste Comes First, Not Just Formulas
Chefs cook with passion and palates. Their focus is flavour, aroma, and texture — the elements that make a dish not just edible, but memorable.
Food scientists, on the other hand, often develop recipes using spreadsheets and chemical equations. Their priority? Efficiency, preservation, and cost. That might mean more emulsifiers, artificial flavours, and texture enhancers... and a lot less soul.
2. Real Ingredients Over Additives
When chefs design meals, they use real ingredients: herbs, spices, fresh vegetables, quality proteins. Food scientists often work with powders, concentrates, gums, and stabilisers to replicate a version of food that can survive transport, temperature changes, and long shelf lives. The result? A food-like product that mimics the real thing but rarely delivers on nutrition or taste.
3. Chefs Understand the Human Side of Eating
Eating isn’t just about fuel. It’s about joy, culture, memory, and even therapy. Chefs and cooks craft meals that engage the senses and emotions — food that comforts, excites, and brings people together. Their creations are often inspired by tradition, creativity, and a desire to please diners. Food scientists, in contrast, are rarely designing for love — they’re designing for mass production.
4. Better for Your Health (Most of the Time)
Chef-made food tends to include fewer ultra-processed ingredients. It’s typically cooked fresh and enjoyed shortly after. Lab-designed meals — ready meals, heavily processed snacks, or instant foods, often rely on preservatives, salt, sugar, and fats to make them shelf-stable and palatable. The result is a range of products linked to weight gain, metabolic issues, and gut imbalances.
5. Chefs Are Transparent. Food Labs Often Aren’t
When you watch a chef cook, you can see what goes in. In a restaurant or open kitchen, transparency is part of the process. But when food is made in a lab, ingredients can have names that most of us can't pronounce. Consumers may not even realise what’s in their food or why it was added in the first place.
6. Supporting Craft and Culture
By choosing food made by chefs and cooks, you’re also supporting small businesses, independent restaurants, local producers, and culinary traditions. This means better food economies, more sustainable practices, and a greater diversity of dishes and cultural expression. Food scientists often work for conglomerates with very different priorities: uniformity, scale, and shareholder value.
7. The Intangible: Love, Skill, and Intuition
No algorithm can replicate the intuition of a good cook or the artistry of a great chef. The small adjustments — a splash more lemon, a touch more spice — that elevate a dish from good to exceptional are only possible when food is made by people who truly understand cooking.
Food made by chefs nourishes the body and the spirit. While food scientists have their place in ensuring safety and innovation, they should never replace the role of passionate cooks in our lives. If you want food that’s rich in flavour, full of life, and made with intention, choose meals created by chefs, not machines.
After all, would you rather eat something made with love, or something made for logistics?

.jpg)


.jpg)

